Since it's mid-June, nothing is going on worth discussing, lets take a look at possible division breakdowns for the Big Ten.
-----------------
Site News: If you'd like to discuss this topic, or any other topic relating to Michigan football, head on over to our new forum page. We're just getting it going, so feel free to comment on a topic, or start a new topic of your own. Its an open forum for everyone, so feel free.
-----------------
Let's take a look at a few possible scenarios. First, lets examine the typical and over-used example of two 6-team divisions. We'll do an East-West breakdown as that makes the most sense for the Big Ten geographically as scenario #1
East
Michigan
Penn State
tOSU
MSU
Purdue
Indiana
West
Nebraska
Illinois
Wisconsin
Northwestern
Iowa
Minnesota
This scenario uses a simple dividing line to determine the divisions. Its a little top-heavy in the east with 3 of the 4 powerhouses, but like I said, it's just a geographical division. It has nothing to do with competitive balance.
Scenario #2 offers up a North-South dividing line.
North
Michigan
Minnesota
Wisconsin
MSU
Northwestern
Iowa
South
tOSU
Penn State
Nebraska
Purdue
Illinois
Indiana
Not bad actually. A little more even in terms of competition. Nebraska and Iowa could probably go either way in this case.
Scenario #3 goes a step in the other direction and attempts to divide up the conference. In this case, we'll try and keep time-honored rivalries intact, as well as provide a somewhat even competitive balance.
Division A
Michigan
tOSU
Illinois
Michigan State
Northwestern
Iowa
Division B
Penn State
Nebraska
Indiana
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Purdue
I like this scenario best for a 2-division conference. It keeps Michigan-tOSU, Michigan-MSU, tOSU-Illinois, Illinois-NU, Minnesota-Wisconsin, Purdue-Indiana all intact cleanly, while also providing a nice competitive balance.
So...
What happens if the Big Ten decides to go to a 3-division conference?
Breaking it up geographically really seems to tough, and clearly would not make equal divisions in terms team success. So a more thought-out process of dividing up the teams would be necessary. Here's my idea of a 3-division breakdown.
Division 1
Michigan
tOSU
Michigan State
Illinois
Division 2
Penn State
Iowa
Purdue
Indiana
Division 3
Nebraska
Wisconsin
Northwestern
Minnesota
This scenario tries to keep basic rivalries intact, while also keeping in mind geography. But the main feature of this 3-division system is that you can have more cross-division play each year. With a 2-division system, you're more locked into playing the other 5 teams in you division every year. This way, you keep your main rival every year, but you also have the ability and freedom to float other rivals in and out of your schedule.
Search
Follow MBN on Instagram
View this profile on InstagramMaize & Blue Nation (@maizebluenation) • Instagram photos and videos
MBN Archive
-
▼
2010
(270)
-
▼
June
(16)
- New Michigan Field Is In
- Blog News Update
- Friday Links
- Michigan Renews Partnership with the M Den
- New Scoreboards Coming to Big House?
- Antonio Kinard is Out, Dorsey to Louisville
- Big Ten Divisions
- Koman Coulibaly or Jim Joyce - Which is Worse?
- Conference Renaming
- It Is Done: Nebraska to Join Big Ten in 2011
- Dorsey, USC and Izzo...Oh My!
- Nebraska Set to Join the Big Ten
- Ohio State To Create It's Own Conference
- The Winds of Change
- USC to Discover NCAA Ruling this Friday
- Big Ten Coaches Hot Seat - Part 2
-
▼
June
(16)
No comments
Post a Comment